# transfer.sh vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transfer.sh | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 905 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +2 430 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transfersh-vs-world-monitor