# transfer.sh vs wger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transfer.sh | wger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 15 905 ✓ | 7 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +240 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

wger scores 73/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

wger ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; wger needs more configuration.

wger is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)
- [wger](https://selfhost.directory/project/wger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transfersh-vs-wger