# transcriber vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transcriber | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 2 922 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transcriber-vs-zot-registry