# transcriber vs vLLM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transcriber | vLLM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 95 833 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +3 189 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

vLLM scores 91/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 189 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)
- [vLLM](https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transcriber-vs-vllm