# transcriber vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transcriber | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 17 185 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

## Details

- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transcriber-vs-upptime