# transcriber vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transcriber | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 78 743 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 019 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

unsloth ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 019 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transcriber-vs-unsloth