# transcriber vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | transcriber | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 154 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; transcriber needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/transcriber-vs-typst