# Traffic Source vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Traffic Source | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 27 in Analytics | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 39 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Traffic Source needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Traffic Source](https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traffic-source.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/traffic-source-vs-umami