# Traefik vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Traefik | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 65 402 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Traefik needs more configuration.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/traefik-vs-url-to-png