# Traefik vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Traefik | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 65 401 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +446 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 86/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

Traefik is growing faster right now (+446 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/traefik-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api