# TradingAgents vs Zulip

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Zulip |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 117 928 ✓ | 26 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 569 ✓ | +191 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 12.3 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 82/100 for Zulip, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Zulip.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zulip.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-zulip