# TradingAgents vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 117 928 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 569 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-zookeeper