# TradingAgents vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 118 130 ✓ | 15 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 771 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-zigbee2mqtt