# TradingAgents vs Zealot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Zealot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 ✓ | 1 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Zealot.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Zealot](https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-zealot