# TradingAgents vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 ✓ | 6 519 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 ✓ | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 75/100 for Zabbix, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-zabbix