# TradingAgents vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 117 750 ✓ | 89 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 391 ✓ | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents and World Monitor score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-world-monitor