# TradingAgents vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 117 877 ✓ | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 518 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-woodpecker-ci