# TradingAgents vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 ✓ | 53 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 ✓ | +329 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 83/100 for WindowsinDocker, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-windowsindocker