# TradingAgents vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 ✓ | 17 955 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 ✓ | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 29 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 75/100 for verdaccio, so it is the safer default.

verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-verdaccio