# TradingAgents vs Vane

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Vane |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 118 043 ✓ | 37 828 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 684 ✓ | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Vane, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Vane.

If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Vane](https://selfhost.directory/project/vane) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vane.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-vane