# TradingAgents vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-uusec-waf