# TradingAgents vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api