# TradingAgents vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 117 750 ✓ | 56 867 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 391 ✓ | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Typst, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-typst