# TradingAgents vs Typesense

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 117 816 ✓ | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 457 ✓ | +477 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 79/100 for Typesense, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-typesense