# TradingAgents vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TradingAgents | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 ✓ | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 ✓ | +248 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tradingagents-vs-trigger