# torqvoice vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | torqvoice | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 45 | 93 041 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +1 294 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 43/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; torqvoice needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/torqvoice-vs-uptime-kuma