# Torollo vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Torollo | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 30 in Education | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 449 | 1 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.

Torollo ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Torollo](https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/torollo-vs-uusec-waf