# Torollo vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Torollo | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 30 in Education | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 449 | 93 048 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Torollo](https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/torollo-vs-uptime-kuma