# Torollo vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Torollo | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 30 in Education | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 449 | 16 647 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +260 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

trigger scores 76/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.

If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+260 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Torollo](https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torollo.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/torollo-vs-trigger