# ToolJet vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ToolJet | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 17 in Low Code | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 41 141 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ToolJet scores 77/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ToolJet](https://selfhost.directory/project/tooljet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tooljet.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tooljet-vs-transcriber