# tobab vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tobab | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 40 in Authentication | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 155 | 53 781 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +386 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+386 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tobab-vs-windowsindocker