# tobab vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tobab | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #34 of 40 in Authentication | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 155 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tobab-vs-windows-arm