# Tipi vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Tipi | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 22 in Home Server | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 9 708 | 93 034 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +1 287 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.11.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 71/100 for Tipi, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Tipi.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Tipi](https://selfhost.directory/project/tipi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tipi.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tipi-vs-uptime-kuma