timesheetvsWakapi
Two self-hosted Time Tracking projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| timesheet | Wakapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking | #4 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 171 | 4 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +32 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | 2.18.2 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Vue | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Wakapi scores 64/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.
Wakapi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timesheet.
If you want the quickest setup, Wakapi is easier to run; timesheet needs more configuration.
Wakapi is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
timesheet details →Wakapi details →All Time Tracking projects →
Swap a project
Keep timesheet, compare it with
Keep Wakapi, compare it with