# tiledesk vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tiledesk | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 110 in Chat | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.2.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Mustache | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 51/100 for tiledesk, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tiledesk.

tiledesk is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tiledesk](https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tiledesk.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tiledesk-vs-windows-arm