# Apache Tika vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Tika | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 114 | 8 651 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +156 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tika-vs-workout-cool