# Apache Tika vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Tika | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 4 115 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tika-vs-urocissa