# Apache Tika vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Tika | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 4 115 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

uncompressed ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tika-vs-uncompressed