# tidb vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tidb | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 40 685 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for tidb.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; tidb needs more configuration.

tidb is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tidb-vs-uusec-waf