# tidb vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tidb | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 38 in Databases | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 40 685 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v8.5.8 · 27 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

tidb scores 80/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

tidb ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

tidb is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tidb](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidb.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tidb-vs-tunesynctool