# tidaloader vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tidaloader | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 31 in Music | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 160 | 3 622 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

Urbit scores 63/100 against 46/100 for tidaloader, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tidaloader.

If you want the quickest setup, tidaloader is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tidaloader](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidaloader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidaloader.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tidaloader-vs-urbit