# TG Vault vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | TG Vault | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 34 in File Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 277 | 93 062 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +1 268 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 48/100 for TG Vault, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TG Vault.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; TG Vault needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [TG Vault](https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-vault) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-vault.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tg-vault-vs-uptime-kuma