# tg-spam vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | tg-spam | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 4 in Anti-Spam | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 453 | 118 043 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 684 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.29.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 52/100 for tg-spam, so it is the safer default.

tg-spam ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, tg-spam is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [tg-spam](https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/tg-spam-vs-tradingagents