# textsnap vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | textsnap | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 196 | 4 114 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

textsnap ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.

Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/textsnap-vs-tika