# Text Generation WebUI vs Yarrtube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | Yarrtube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 47 725 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [Yarrtube](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-yarrtube