Text Generation WebUIvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with