# Text Generation WebUI vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-woodpecker-ci