# Text Generation WebUI vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-uusec-waf