# Text Generation WebUI vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-url-to-png