# Text Generation WebUI vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Text Generation WebUI | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 ✓ | 16 644 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI and trigger score the same (76/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

trigger is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/text-generation-webui-vs-trigger